Evaluate five intelligence capabilities, assess the evidence behind each rating, and prioritize improvement opportunities based on both gaps and organizational impact.
Exploratory self-assessment, not a validated maturity model. Scores are self-reported and do not establish organizational performance.
START YOUR ASSESSMENT
How does your organization turn signals into outcomes?
15 assessment statements across five capabilities. For each capability, document the evidence, its confidence level, and the importance of improving it. You can also load our fictional Northstar Energy pilot.
Your responses stay in this browser tab unless you download or print them. No account, backend, or third-party analytics is included in this prototype.
— / 5
A rating without supporting evidence remains provisional, even if the numerical score is high.
Rate all three statements to continue.
EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE REPORT
Your intelligence capability profile
OVERALL SELF-RATING/ 5
EVIDENCE COVERAGE
KEY INTERPRETATION
What the scores suggest
Prioritized improvement opportunities
Priority is a heuristic combining the capability gap, selected improvement impact, and evidence uncertainty—not a validated risk score or definitive ranking.
Executive summary
Methodology note: capability averages use three equally weighted ratings each; overall average is the mean of five capability averages. Evidence confidence and improvement impact affect prioritization only, not capability scores. The five capabilities are complementary, not a fixed maturity ladder. No benchmarking or empirical validation is implied.